🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he does so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.