🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear warning from the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to determine in the coming days on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial needs.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Russian frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. It has threatened reciprocal actions, such as seizing European corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are working on steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."